Donald Trump remains fixated on the Nobel Peace Prize. If nomination alone guaranteed selection, he would have won four times. Prospective recipients must embody more than political maneuvering—they must demonstrate a sustained commitment to peace.
It is Trump’s inconsistencies that have disqualified him from previously receiving this award. This time, his hopes are blocked by his self-proclaimed ability to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours, his attempts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, and his efforts to pressure Iran into negotiations—all of which have failed. However, recognition by the Nobel Committee requires more than bold declarations—it demands a sustained commitment to peace that transcends political ambition.
Back in 2018, convinced of his worthiness, Trump reportedly commissioned a replica of the prize and prominently displayed it in the Oval Office. During a daily White House briefing, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended his move, claiming that rather than “waiting around” for the Nobel committee in Oslo, Trump had simply “taken the initiative.” The replica served as both a personal trophy and a public statement, reinforcing Trump’s belief that recognition should be dictated by self-perception rather than any outside standards.
Yet as Trump continues to position himself as a global peace negotiator, the escalating conflict between Israel and Iraq underscores the limits of his diplomatic legacy. While the Abraham Accords once symbolized a breakthrough in Middle Eastern relations, the region now faces renewed instability, with Israel caught between Iranian influence and U.S. interests. In this volatile landscape, the Nobel Committee remains steadfast in its criteria—true peacemakers must demonstrate enduring commitment, not fleeting deals.
   #40 WED ARI 4/19/1939 Ayatollah Ali Khamene |
   #63 FRI GEM 6/14/1946 Donald P. Trump |   #67 FRI LIB 10/21/1949 Benjamin Netanyahu |
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was born on a Wednesday under the zodiac sign of Aries. His character is shaped by the dual influence of Mercury and Mars. Mercury governs his INNER SELF, fostering intellect, strategic adaptability, and calculated communication, while Mars fuels his OUTER SELF, driving assertiveness, military command, and confrontational leadership. This blend cultivates both sharp analysis and decisive execution, making him a formidable strategist. His reputation as dangerous and unpredictable stems from this razor sharp rulership combination. This dynamic reinforces the perception that his leadership is as calculated as it is aggressive.
Donald Trump, born on a Friday, embodies Venusian charm and persuasion, governing his INNER SELF while Mercury governs his OUTER SELF, amplifying his communication-driven unpredictability and media dominance. His leadership style reflects quick decision-making and opportunistic adaptability, prioritizing personal influence over diplomatic consistency. In his dealings with Khamenei, Trump has responded with economic pressure, sanctions, and confrontational rhetoric, withdrawing from the Iran Nuclear Deal and heightening tensions with bold, unfiltered statements that disrupt diplomatic norms rather than establish stability.
Benjamin Netanyahu, born on a Friday under Libra, carries an even stronger Venusian influence, ruling both his INNER and OUTER selves. This dual rulership heightens his diplomatic skill, ideological depth, and calculated leadership, allowing him to maintain highly strategic alliances. His approach to governance reflects an unwavering commitment to Israel’s security. In response to Khamenei’s challenges, Netanyahu perceives Iran’s leadership as a geopolitical threat. His ability to navigate complex geopolitical challenges reinforces Israel’s strategic dominance, allowing him to shape Israel’s regional strategy even as tensions with Iran continue to escalate.
Sharing the Friday Day Ray, both Trump and Netanyahu operate under Venusian themes of diplomacy, persuasion, and influence—yet their approaches reveal a transactional nature rather than sustained peace efforts. Both have positioned themselves as proficient dealmakers, but their strategies often prioritize short-term political victories over long-term stability. This tendency has led to short-lived agreements, frequently undone by shifting alliances.
From Khamenei’s perspective, this Venusian influence likely appears opportunistic rather than genuinely cooperative. Operating under a deeply ideological framework, he likely views their diplomatic overtures as calculated moves, designed to bolster personal legacies rather than foster genuine stability. Given the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, Khamenei may perceive their actions as political theater rather than substantive peacemaking.
Despite these tensions, Trump has repeatedly sought recognition for his diplomatic efforts. However, his past clashes with Khamenei—such as pulling out of the Iran Nuclear Deal, imposing sanctions, and escalating rhetoric—make it unlikely that his efforts will be viewed as genuine. Netanyahu, with his firm stance against Iran, further ensures that any cooperation between Trump and Khamenei remains unstable and unlikely. No progress in sight. And so it goes.
